Quality Resources for Multicultural Ministry & Biblical Exploration

Philosophy

Is Everything Meaningless? Tragic Nihilism and the God-Honouring Realism of Ecclesiastes

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

Sartre’s The Reprieve covers eight days in the lives of various people in France before the signing of the Munich Agreement, soon followed by the German invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1938. Frenchmen are being called up for military service. In this context Sartre invites us to overhear Mathieu’s conversation with his brother Jacques:
Mathieu returned and sat […]

Read more...

Are Mind and Brain the Same?

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

In Philosophy Now (Sept/Oct 2009) Raymond Tallis argues against the idea that mind and brain are the same thing. Here he distinguishes between necessary and sufficient conditions. To use his example: it is a necessary condition of Tallis being knocked down by a 97 bus in London that he must be in London. But this […]

Read more...

Carl Jung’s Monism and Neo-Paganism

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), founder of analytical psychology, wrote voluminously, 18 volumes of Collected Works and secondary commentary. Jung was a highly influential figure. He was a psychiatrist who became a psychotherapist. But he was also a cultural commentator and quasi-mystic. His doctoral research involved investigating a medium, his maternal cousin, Hélène Preiswerk.
Jung was intensely […]

Read more...

Is God Foundational to Morality?

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Yesterday on the way to work I was listening to a podcast by atheistic philosopher, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, based at Duke University in North Carolina. He was ridiculing the idea that you have to have a God in order to have morality. There were many aspects of his reasoning I found suspect, including the way he […]

Read more...

Sam Spade, Macbeth and Existential Christians?

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

In the movie The Maltese Cross, Humphrey Bogart plays the role of Dashiell Hammett’s famous hard-nosed detective, Sam Spade. Hammett’s world is a godless world, ruled by chance and violence with individuals being alone in a meaningless world. Macbeth lives in a similar kind of world. Macbeth is a tragic figure. Michael Rockler sees Macbeth […]

Read more...

Producing Satisfactory Results

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

I like this quote I picked up from recently deceased Polish philosopher, Lesek Kolakowski:
Every work of man is a compromise between the material and the tool. Tools are never quite equal to their tasks, and none is beyond improvement. Aside from differences in human skill, the tool’s imperfection and the material’s resistance together set the […]

Read more...

Sartre, Freedom and the Deification of Self

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

In Being and Nothingness Sartre presents his depressing view of individual freedom grounded in self-limited epistemology and drowning in a merciless sea of subjectivity:
…I can say of Pierre, who is dead: “He loved music.” In this case, the subject like the attribute is past. There is no living Pierre in terms of which this past-being […]

Read more...

Is the Problem of Evil the Greatest Challenge to Religious Belief?

Sunday, September 6th, 2009

Nigel Warburton, immediately before interviewing Marilyn McCord Adams, comments that there is no greater challenge to religious belief than the problem of evil. If there is an all-powerful, all-good God then why does he allow such terrible suffering in the world?
It is perhaps Warburton’s view that the problem of evil is the greatest challenge to […]

Read more...

Human Identity, Yin-Yang Philosophy and Biblical Thought

Saturday, September 5th, 2009

In What Has Jerusalem To Do With Beijing? Yeo Khiok-khng points out that one of main presuppositions of yin-yang philosophy is that cosmology is more important than anthropology. He comments:
A true understanding of the self is not attained merely by studying oneself, but requires studying the self in relation to the larger whole in which […]

Read more...

Sartre: Morality, Freedom and Self

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

In Being and Nothingness. Sartre contends,
Values in actuality are demands which lay claim to a foundation.
He goes on to explain that:
[value] can be revealed only to an active freedom which makes it exist as value by the sole fact of recognizing it as such. It follows that my freedom is the unique foundation of values and […]

Read more...

Appearance and Reality: Contrasts with Kant and Sartre

Monday, August 10th, 2009

There are two aspects of Kant’s philosophy which came under attack. His synthetic a priori  - his contention that some things can be established by reason alone that are not just tautologies (true by definition) - was rejected by G.E. Moore, Wittgenstein, Logical Positivists and the Vienna Circle, all representing the Analytic tradition of philosophy. […]

Read more...

Cultural and Moral Limits to Rationality

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Eastern religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism have long stood against the idea that truth can be apprehended through reason. At best reason is akin to a boat that one uses to get to a certain desired point in the process after which it can be left behind.
Yet even in Western philosophy cultural factors throw considerable […]

Read more...

Crooked Timber

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Immanuel Kant once observed, “Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made.” One of the most accessed blogs in the world, Crooked Timber, is based on this quote.
I have not been able to track down as yet the source of Kant’s statement and I am not sure exactly what he meant. I […]

Read more...

Foundations for Inalienable Rights

Sunday, June 28th, 2009

I must confess I have a lot of sympathy for Jeremy Bentham’s regard for natural rights:
Right… is the child of law; from real laws come real rights; but from imaginary laws, from laws of nature, fancied and invented by poets, rhetoricians, and dealers in moral and intellectual poisons, come imaginary rights, a bastard brood of monsters.
Natural rights is […]

Read more...

Paternalism, Autonomy and Human Worth

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

The Oxford Companion to Philosophy defines paternalism as “the power or authority one person or institution exercises over another to confer benefits or prevent harm for the latter regardless of the latter’s informed consent.” However, Seana V. Shiffrin argues that all that is necessary for paternalism to occur is for the the paternalist to take […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? Eighth Bite

Monday, June 8th, 2009

Summarising Plantinga’s approach to this question, we began with four propositions:
1. God is omnipotent
2. God is wholly good
3. God is omniscient
4. Evil exists
It has never been shown that this logical set is implicitly inconsistent. Yet it does not necessarily follow that it is implicitly consistent. Can it be shown that there is in fact no inconsistency here?
Plantinga begins by considering […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? Seventh Bite

Monday, May 18th, 2009

Following Plantinga, we have seen that no explicit or formal contradiction is involved in the following propositions:
1. God is omnipotent.
2. God is wholly good.
and
3. Evil exists.
We considered an attempt to demonstrate an implicit contradiction by adding the following two propositions:
4c. An omnipotent and omniscient good being eliminates every evil that it can properly eliminate.
and
5. There are no limits to […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? Sixth Bite

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

Following Plantinga, we have seen that no explicit or formal contradiction is involved in the following propositions:
1. God is omnipotent.
2. God is wholly good.
and
3. Evil exists.
We considered an attempt to demonstrate an implicit contradiction by adding the following two propositions:
4a. Every good thing always eliminates evil that it knows about and can eliminate.
and
5. There are no limits to what […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? Fifth Bite

Saturday, May 16th, 2009

Following Plantinga, we have seen that no explicit or formal contradiction is involved in the following propositions:
1. God is omnipotent.
2. God is wholly good.
and
3. Evil exists.
We considered Mackie’s attempt to demonstrate an implicit contradiction by adding the following two propositions:
4. A good thing always eliminates evil as far as it can.
and
5. There are no limits to what an omnipotent being […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? Fourth Bite

Friday, May 8th, 2009

At this point we need to recall the example containing three propositions concerning the ages of George, Paul and Nick. To demonstrate that these were implicitly contradictory another proposition(s) had to be added that was necessarily true. Since the fourth proposition clearly was of this nature there was no doubt that the three propositions did […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? First Bite

Sunday, May 3rd, 2009

In God, Freedom and Evil Alvin Plantinga distinguishes between various kinds of contradictions and argues that it is not possible to construct a logical set that demonstrates there is a contradiction between the reality of evil, on the one hand, and God’s goodness, omnipotence, omniscience, on the other.
The typical function of natural theology, involving philosophical […]

Read more...

The Purposelessness of Removing Purpose

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Midgley rejects Dawkinism, which Dawkins erroneously assumes to be Darwinism, when Dawkins dismisses as preposterous the notion that there is any meaning or purpose to existence. Dawkins believes that there is no such thing as justice, no evil and no good.
Midgley argues that even in a purely naturalistic universe the terms “good” and “evil” have […]

Read more...

Visualising a Perfect World

Friday, March 13th, 2009

Over 5 years Debra Trione interviewed 60 of America’s most powerful and influential people - in politics, law, business, the military and publishing - regarding their visions of a perfect world. In doing so she used a unique and, indeed, rather peculiar interview technique.
Trione began with broad questions such as: “Name two things you hope will be true […]

Read more...

Belief in God and Belief in Evolution and Purpose

Thursday, March 5th, 2009

In the editorial for the January/February edition of Philosophy Now, Grant Bartley reports on the results of a survey among their well-educated and presumably scientifically-aware readers. When asked, “Is there a God?” 52% said Yes, 31% No and 17% Don’t Know - an overall majority for God.
This particular issue was entitled Darwin & Friends, given […]

Read more...

Nassim Nicholas Taleb Versus True Faith

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of The Black Swan, insists that when a person makes a decision this does not involve acting on ‘raw beliefs’ about the situation in question, nor on what probabilitists call ‘degrees of belief’, but rather on the possible consequences as perceived by that person. He maintains,
Perception of impact, that is, of […]

Read more...

Humans as Meta-Level Symbolic Beings

Sunday, March 1st, 2009

It was the view of Ernst Cassirer that humans are unique in the animal kingdom since they are the only beings with a “symbolic imagination and intelligence.” Human symbols transcend the things referred to and involve conception. People mentally react to their symbols. Cassirer argued that “instead of defining man as an animal rationale, we […]

Read more...

Culture and “Second Nature”

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Poseidonius spoke of man’s “second nature” in expressing his view that by nature people are indispensably dependent on culture. Johann Herder followed suit but adding his view that the development of language and culture is necessitated by human deficiencies and incompleteness.
Helmuth Plessner explained the development of culture as arising from what he termed “homelessness” and “excentricity”, […]

Read more...

Existentialism and the Freedom to Make Matters Worse

Friday, February 20th, 2009

Existentialism is committed to the principle that existence precedes essence. This means that we, through our own actions and choices (existence) determine our own nature (essence). Simone de Beauvoir qualified this by her distinction between “in-itself” and “for-itself.” She recognised that both of these dimensions are found in people and accounts for what she described […]

Read more...

Knowledge of Self: Rousseau, Al Ghazzali, Calvin and David

Saturday, December 20th, 2008

Peter Abbs identifies Jean-Jacques Rousseau as “the first significant philosopher of deep personal autobiography” (”The Full Revelation of the Self” in Philosophy Now [July/August 2008] 17). Rousseau contrasted himself with other Enlightenment philosophers:
I have met many men who were more learned in their philosophising, but their philosophy remained, as it were, external to them. Wanting […]

Read more...

Nietzsche, Repression and Essential Humanity

Friday, December 19th, 2008

It was Nietzsche’s understanding that Christianity was essentially repressive. He assumed that initially man in his state of natural innocence simply followed his instincts. Judeo-Christian religion has damaged this with its emphasis on guilt and repression. Indeed, as Cathal Horan points out, for Nietzsche it is this repression of instincts which explains the evolution of […]

Read more...

Ecclesiastes: Is Life Meaningless? 2nd Post

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

I was listening to a podcast some time back (I’ve forgotten the source) which described Nietzsche as perhaps the most art-obsessed philosopher of all time. Apparently, he saw himself as a poet and composer, though others found it difficult to share this opinion. Nietzsche believed that the pre-Socratic ancient Greeks used art to deal with […]

Read more...

Ecclesiastes: Is Life Meaningless? 1st Post

Friday, November 28th, 2008

Barbara and I are currently reading Ecclesiastes. The book begins:
“Meaningless! Meaningless! ” says the Teacher. “Utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless” (1:2).
This theme permeates the book. For example, we read:
I have seen all the things that are done under the sun; all of them are meaningless, a chasing after the wind (1:14).
Then I applied myself to the […]

Read more...

Books, Art and Morality

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

In a stimulating article (”Wilde and Morality” in Philosophy Now 65 [Jan-Feb 08] 28-30) Peter Benson explores the relationship of Wilde’s classic The Portrait of Dorian Gray to morality. In the preface to this book Oscar Wilde provocatively claimed,
There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written or […]

Read more...

Unconscious Drives: Freud, Schopenhauer & the Bible

Saturday, November 8th, 2008

“The heart is deceitful above all things and beyond cure. Who can understand it?” (Jeremiah 17:9)
These words were communicated by God via Jeremiah following the catastrophic events of 586 BCE.  It is quite evident that Freud did not discover the unconscious. The Bible is very much aware that the sinful behaviour of people is the product […]

Read more...

Schopenhauer and Knowing the Real World

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

According to Arthur Schopenhauer, the only experience we have of the world is not of the world itself. Rather, it is a representation of the world that we have in our minds. Schopenhauer knew full well that most people would reject this view and insist that external objects show the world is more than a […]

Read more...

Hegel and Self-Consciousness

Monday, October 20th, 2008

Hegel reasoned that if people are to enjoy the full richness of human experience then they must avoid being detached and isolated from the world. We become so detached when we seek knowledge in external objects separate from consciousness. That is, people see themselves as separate from the world and treat self and world as […]

Read more...

Hegel and the Creator-Creation Distinction

Thursday, September 18th, 2008

In Hegel’s thought the self-revealing God of the Bible becomes a pathetic “god” subsumed by what Hegel regarded as a higher conception: ultimate reality as Mind or Spirit. The jury is still out on whether Hegel was a pantheist or not, though there is a great deal about his thought which encourages us to see him this way. […]

Read more...

Freudian Slips and the Fall

Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

In Philosophy Now (July/August 2008) Cathal Horan comments:
Some people consider Freud to be one of the three most important figures in human history, sharing the podium with Copernicus and Darwin. The key to this claim is that all these thinkers shook the foundations of human thought by showing that we are not as important or […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? Third Bite

Sunday, July 13th, 2008

In the last blog on this subject I pointed out the obvious: that the reality of evil does not constitute an explicit contradiction of God’s goodness, omnipotence and omniscience. But does it constitute a formal contradiction? As Plantinga (God, Freedom and Evil) points out this depends on whether it is possible for the atheologian (the […]

Read more...

Does the Reality of Evil Contradict God’s Goodness, Omnipotence and Omniscience? Second Bite

Friday, July 11th, 2008

In his book God, Freedom and Evil, Alvin Plantinga gives the following example of an explicit contradiction:
Paul is a good tennis player, and it is false that Paul is a good tennis player.
Technically, an explicit contradiction can be defined as “a conjunctive proposition, one conjunct of which is the denial or negation of the other conjunct” (12). The […]

Read more...

Why We Don’t Eat Brain-Damaged Orphans

Wednesday, June 25th, 2008

Lately, much of what I’ve been reading bears on what it means to be human. Angus Taylor, philosopher and author of Animals and Ethics, argues that consistency requires excluding some humans from the moral community and including at least some animals in it.
A ghoulish story serves as the launching pad for his argument. A Transylvanian Count was […]

Read more...

The Limits of Logic & Socrates

Friday, June 20th, 2008

I enjoyed reading “Dear Socrates” in the latest edition of Philosophy Now, where “Socrates” warns against transfering the certainty of logic itself to a particular argument, pointing out that this itself is a logical error. Why? Because “it conflates validity with soundness”. A good or sound argument is not merely logical but has true premises.
This […]

Read more...

What Happens to Love When “GOD” Goes Backwards

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

Plato argued that the most profound love occurs when we are connected with ultimate truth. Ultimate truth is this: “God is love” (1 John 4:8, 16). The most profound love occurred when God, in his love for us, sent his Son as the propitiation for our sins (1 John 4:10). It is when we grasp […]

Read more...

Anthony Flew: Evidence and Prevarication

Sunday, June 1st, 2008

Biochemical researcher Phil Burcham, an Associate Professor at the University of Western Australia, reminds us of the evidence that had persuaded philosopher Anthony Flew to abandon atheism (”Famous Atheist Recants”, Australian Presbyterian, May 2008, 27-28). Flew will have nothing to do with the Christian conception of God. But he is an evidentialist and he became personally persuaded […]

Read more...

Suppression of Truth & Kierkegaard

Monday, May 19th, 2008

In Romans 1:18 Paul locates the unrighteousness characteristic of all people in their activity of suppressing the truth. In context “the truth” is what God has revealed about himself, which places on us certain moral claims, such as honouring God and giving thanks to him. Adopting an ideal Christian self in the pseudonym Anti-Climacus, Soren […]

Read more...

Monotony and Meaning: Heidegger, Plato & Sartre

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Heidegger is waiting for a train in a provincial station. He feels bored, uneasy and finds himself desperately seeking for any distraction. He thinks of things he would otherwise be doing. He feels he is wasting time, doing nothing.
Can you identify with that? This is the scenario presented by Cathal Horan in an article entitled “Bored […]

Read more...

Why is there Something rather than Nothing?

Thursday, May 1st, 2008

Philosopher-theologian Janet Martin Soskice was once asked if she would participate in a radio program considering the issue of whether there are miracles or not. After she agreed she was told that there would be a leading humanist putting the opposite case. She was asked, “What would you say to him?” She replied, “Why is there something rather than nothing?” […]

Read more...